The National Institute for Health
and Clinical Excellence (NICE), the drugs
“watchdog” recommended last year that every person with stage 4 or 5 CKD should
have a formal dietetic assessment by a specialist renal dietician. This happens
for children with CKD but adult practice varies widely. The NICE Clinical Guidelines on the management of Hyperphosphataemia
highlighted dietary advice as the first line treatment for the management of
hyperphosphataemia rather than straight to pharmacological interventions.
Providing a dietary assessment
for all people with stage, 4 and 5 CKD would cost more money than is currently
spent on dietetic support. It is thought that only 75% of those at risk
routinely receive a specialist renal dietetic assessment. NICE
have now produced a consultation document that estimates the cost to increase
that figure to 95% of adults with stage 4 or 5 CKD receiving dietary advice. This
works out at just under £100,000 per million of the population. Given there are
just above 50 kidney units in the country, the population served by many unit
is in the region of 1 million. Access to specialist renal dietitians fits
completely with the concept of multi-disciplinary team care for those with
advance kidney disease. The NICE clinical
guideline emphasises both the direct
patient management role of renal dietitians
whose advice then needs to be reiterated by other team members,
monitored and reviewed, as well as pointing out that renal dietitians have a crucial teaching and development role to play in supporting the wider
disciplinary team, and providing “refresher” courses for existing staff.
We know from the Renal Registry
reports that overall, only between 60-70% of people on dialysis achieve serum
phosphate levels within the recommended range. Therefore, for most units this
guideline should provide a prompt to review practice and consider changes to
the low clearance clinic and dialysis multi-disciplinary team working. The goal
being to achieve better engagement with patients about their diets, so people
with advanced CKD or on dialysis have a deeper understanding of what options
are available to them.
How is all of this to be paid
for? Especially when the guideline emphasises the importance of starting
phosphate binders early when they are needed. The economic analysis at NICE
suggests that a shift to calcium acetate or calcium carbonate as a first line
phosphate binder could pay for the extra
dietetic personnel costs many times over
by saving upto £3 million pounds per million of the
population. Given the variation in practice at unit level, the assumptions used
in the audit tools and the costing template provided by NICE.
This should help local kidney communities and their commissioners, fine tune
the implementation of this guideline and this can lead to achieving more
consistent dietetic support for patients, better phosphate control and saving money, which can be reinvested in other
aspects of kidney care.
No comments:
Post a Comment